While Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) in solar power plants make renewable energy compatible and sustainable with existing grids, the safety and risk management of these systems comes to the fore. From fire risks to electrical hazards, the complex nature of BESS requires careful risk assessment. Standards such as IEC 62619, NFPA 855 and the Technical Specification provide guidance to mitigate these risks. In this article, we will examine the safety requirements, potential risks and emergency strategies for BESS. Our goal is to lay out a framework that maximizes both the effectiveness and reliability of this technology.
Fire Risks and Precautions
Thermal Leakage and Protection
One of BESS’ biggest safety concerns is the risk of thermal runaway in battery cells. IEC 62619 requires cells to limit combustion propagation in overcharge or short-circuit situations. According to the Technical Specification, while LFP batteries offer the advantage of thermal stability, fire suppression systems compliant with NFPA 855 (e.g. aerosol-based) are mandatory. In addition, UL 9540A tests require measures such as intermediate walls that prevent the spread of fire from one cell to others. This minimizes the risk of fire in a solar power plant.
Electrical Safety
Short Circuit and Over Voltage
Electrical risks are another area to be considered when integrating BESS with the grid. IEC TS 62933-5-1 defines safety mechanisms to protect the system in case of short circuit and overvoltage. According to the Technical Specifications, the Power Conversion System (PCS) should absorb sudden load changes by reacting within 200 ms and should be backed by fuses. For example, a sudden voltage spike in a 10 MW system should be controlled by the BMS activating circuit breakers.
Environmental and Operational Risks
Temperature and Humidity Control
Environmental factors can also affect BESS safety. IEC TS 62933-4-1 addresses the impact of temperature and humidity on battery performance, stipulating a range of 15-25°C with recommended HVAC systems. Excessive temperature can shorten battery life or increase the risk of thermal runaway, while high humidity can lead to corrosion. For example, in a solar power plant, HVAC failure can jeopardize the system’s 80% Depth of Discharge (DoD) performance. These risks should be avoided through regular maintenance and monitoring.
Emergency Strategies
Simulation and Response Plan
Beyond risks, emergency preparedness is also critical. While NFPA 855 provides evacuation and extinguishing protocols for fire scenarios, 3 days theoretical + 3 days practical staff training is also recommended. For example, a thermal runaway in a power plant can be simulated to test the response time of teams; the BMS should disconnect the grid and alert operators when it detects the event. The test methods of IEC 62933-2-1 are used to verify the resilience of the system in such scenarios.
Security and the Future
The safety of BESS is essential to ensure the long-term success of solar power plants. The management of fire, electrical and environmental risks must be ensured by both standards and practical measures. IEC 62619, NFPA 855 and the Technical Specifications prepared by the Solar Employer’s Engineer provide guidance in this process, while regular testing and training keep risks under control.
If you need engineering for your storage solar power plants, you can contact us at [email protected].